Friday, November 21, 2025

Creating liberating content

Fugees rapper Pras Michel...

Grammy-winning rapper Prakazrel "Pras" Michel of the Fugees was...

NASA releases close-up images...

NASA released close-up images on Wednesday of the rare...

College football Week 13...

Bill ConnellyNov 21, 2025, 07:15 AM ETCloseBill Connelly is a writer for ESPN....
HomeLifestyle & Wellness‘Case No. 9’...

‘Case No. 9’ removes line about 26th Amendment from its YouTube video

Episode 17 of the drama featured a courtroom scene referencing the 26th Amendment and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah

A recent episode of Geo Entertainment’s Case No. 9 has prompted discussion online after viewers noticed that a significant courtroom exchange aired on television was missing from the drama’s official YouTube upload.

The episode in question, which went out on Wednesday night, featured Aaminah Sheikh’s character, Beenish, delivering a rebuttal in court while defending Seher, played by Saba Qamar. During cross-examination, Faysal Quraishi’s character attempts to cast doubt on Seher’s credibility by referring to her as a divorced woman and “not a virgin.” Beenish responds by citing landmark judgments by Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, arguing that a woman’s past relationships have no bearing on her character or on a rape case, a sentiment noted in Justice Malik’s own rulings.

It was Beenish’s introduction to Justice Shah’s judgment that drew attention. In the original broadcast, she states, Had the 26th Constitutional Amendment not been passed, blocking his way, he would have been our country’s chief justice.” The opposing counsel counters by quoting Mirza Ghalib and asserting parliament’s supremacy: “Parliament is the country’s supreme institution and it has passed the 26th Amendment.

By the next morning, this exchange, visible in the TV telecast, had been removed from the episode uploaded to YouTube. Writer of the drama and journalist Shahzeb Khanzada later shared the unedited clip on X, confirming that the omission was not part of the original broadcast.

The reference touches on a politically sensitive chapter of recent judicial history. Passed in early October 2024, the 26th Constitutional Amendment limited the Supreme Court’s suo motu powers, fixed the chief justice’s term at three years, and shifted the power of appointing the next CJP to the prime minister, who could choose from the three most senior judges. Previously, the top post automatically went to the senior-most judge.

Despite the edit, Case No. 9 has received praise for its handling of difficult subject matter. The show, starring Saba Qamar, Amina Sheikh and Faiysal Quraishi, has been widely appreciated for addressing the obstacles faced by rape survivors within Pakistan’s justice system and for including judicial language and precedent into its storytelling.

Source link

Continue reading

Fugees rapper Pras Michel receives 14-year sentence for illegal contributions tied to Obama campaign

Grammy-winning rapper Prakazrel "Pras" Michel of the Fugees was sentenced on Thursday to 14 years in prison for a case in which he was convicted of illegally funneling millions of dollars in foreign contributions to...

NASA releases close-up images of interstellar comet making a rare flyby

NASA released close-up images on Wednesday of the rare interstellar comet that's making a single pass through the solar system.One of the images shows the comet, also known as 3I/ATLAS, as it moves through space about...